Mxr plays shut down AGAIN

[Mr. X]

So sad that youtube up and demonetizes half their videos without reason. I liked their channel. Jeannie is definitely the star. Censorship is getting crazy now.

[ThePornCritic]

I just did research on this channel. I don't follow all of the channels or big players. This guy and gal are new people to me.

If a person looks deep enough for a few minutes, then you can easily spot the issue. The guy admits his thumbnails are very bad.

They are clearly violating YouTube's policy for thumbnails with clickbait. Furthermore, they are using sexual clickbait to lure people to their videos. Channels have been punished for using clickbait in an abusive manner. They put lazy scam artist Belle Delphine in a sexual position in a thumbnail. The video has nothing to do with Belle Delphine and lures people to their videos.

YouTube doesn't allow porn. MRX is not posting porn. However, his thumbnails make the suggestion of porn. He is triggering their system with his thumbnails.

I suspect the first people who approved the thumbnails made an error and the second person, a higher up realized the grave error.

Censorship is not going crazy. Websites have certain standards for content. Might Hypnotic has standards for this site. I have standards for my sites. I know you are more open to offensive content such as the story about Supergirl's weakness is black men on your site.

One of my most popular pages on one of my websites was facing similar issues as MRX. However, Google (owns YouTube) overturned their decision and reactivated monetization for the page. The page's title was the sexiest super villainesses from DC comics. However, the images and article were not sexual nor promoted porn. Unlike me, MRX is using sexual images with fake pornstars such as Belle Delphine in sexual positions. My article only had iconic images of superheroines from comics.

[Mr. X]

The point of this video is no consistency or explanation for the cancels. There is no commonality of the thumbnails for example. Someone up and demonetized half of them. They are fully willing to comply with guidelines IF there is a guideline but in this case there is not. They simply do not know what the rules are and see plenty of others showing sexy content on thumbnails. For example girls doing work out videos. Hopefully they get a lawyer and they find out why.

One other issue was a group who buys up rights to videos then sues for a living and they got caught with that since they discuss tic toc and reddit videos. However those are already out in public.

[ThePornCritic]

The point of this video is no consistency or explanation for the cancels. There is no commonality of the thumbnails for example. Someone up and demonetized half of them. They are fully willing to comply with guidelines IF there is a guideline but in this case there is not. They simply do not know what the rules are and see plenty of others showing sexy content on thumbnails. For example girls doing work out videos. Hopefully they get a lawyer and they find out why.

One other issue was a group who buys up rights to videos then sues for a living and they got caught with that since they discuss tic toc and reddit videos. However those are already out in public.

The policy is very clear. I advise you and everything in this topic to read YouTube's policy on clickbait. Some forms of clickbait are fine if the images have relation with the content.

Look at the video with the thumbnail of scam artist Belle Delphine. The video is not about her. Now compare it with a video with Belle Delphine on a sexy thumbnail from a different channel. The different channel's video is about Belle Delphine. The sexy pic is clickbait to lure the person, but the difference is the content is about the person. MRX does not do this. Instead, he grabs a sexy picture that looks like porn and the video has no relationship with the actual thumbnail.

The issue is very clear. They are only playing dumb to get people to feel sorry for them and give money to them for breaking the policy.

I suspect more channels will get hit in the future for abusive clickbaits.

Brazzers had a similar practice for many years. They may still be doing this, but I have not joined their site in many years. Brazzers loved taking photos of positions that never appeared in videos. However, they used these images from the photoshot to lure people who liked those positions to sign up to their website. There were many complaints about Brazzers deceitful advertising in tis manner.

[Mr. X]

As the video stated there is NO clear connection between the thumbnails. IF you had watched the video they clearly stated that the videos had varying thumbnails only some of which MIGHT be sexual.

Look if you're not going to look at the issue then please stop debating. I get it and they get it that if it was ONLY the racey thumbnails then that make sense. But there is NO explanation and you tube has already set a precedent allowing these and other thumbnails.

Please watch the video.

[ThePornCritic]

As the video stated there is NO clear connection between the thumbnails. IF you had watched the video they clearly stated that the videos had varying thumbnails only some of which MIGHT be sexual.

Look if you're not going to look at the issue then please stop debating. I get it and they get it that if it was ONLY the racey thumbnails then that make sense. But there is NO explanation and you tube has already set a precedent allowing these and other thumbnails.

Please watch the video.

I DID watch the video. I referenced the guy's statement from the first few minutes of the video.

A different point of view does not mean a person ignored the issue. I clearly see through this guy and girl who are upset because they violated YouTube's standards. I certainly don't believe their full story. There are two sides to every story.

I just did research on this channel. I don't follow all of the channels or big players. This guy and gal are new people to me.

If a person looks deep enough for a few minutes, then you can easily spot the issue. The guy admits his thumbnails are very bad.

There is an explanation for the demonetization. They violated the policy with their sexual and porno type thumbnails. The issue is deeper than that. That's why I suggested you and others to read YouTube's policy on clickbait.

I have explained this and the guy totally does not state this. The main issue is clickbait. There are other videos with sexy thumbnails of Belle Delphine from other creators, and those videos are about the person in the sexy thumbnails. On the other hand, MRX's sexy thumbnails are not about the individuals in those thumbnails. Therefore, he is abusing thumbnails with clickbait of false advertising his content.

There is no "MIGHT be Sexual" in this debate. Have you looked at his thumbnails? One is actually an edited photo of Belle Delphine giving a blowjob with a cucumber blocking the real dick. There are tons of sexual thumbnails that resemble the porno type of thumbnail from porn sites.

[ThePornCritic]

I may be on to something. MXR is lying to their audience. This YouTuber clearly explains the false tale from MXR.

[Mr. X]

One is actually an edited photo of Belle Delphine

You are picking ONE thumbnail. What of the other hundreds cancelled. You're arguing a strawman.

Therefore, he is abusing thumbnails with clickbait of false advertising his content.

My experience is ANYTHING he puts in a thumbnail is in the video, usually short and at the end. So he's not false advertising unless you found some edge case.

You stated you never saw this channel before and now you're magically an expert on their content? I've been watching their channel since about 2019 and have seen a lot of their videos. You are literally going by what you have seen when I posted this story about 6 hours ago.

[ThePornCritic]

One is actually an edited photo of Belle Delphine

You are picking ONE thumbnail. What of the other hundreds cancelled. You're arguing a strawman.

Therefore, he is abusing thumbnails with clickbait of false advertising his content.

My experience is ANYTHING he puts in a thumbnail is in the video, usually short and at the end. So he's not false advertising unless you found some edge case.

You stated you never saw this channel before and now you're magically an expert on their content? I've been watching their channel since about 2019 and have seen a lot of their videos. You are literally going by what you have seen when I posted this story about 6 hours ago.

I'm not picking one thumbnail. There are many examples.

I've watched some of his videos after you posted this topic.

Stop making assumptions about people who disagree with you. You're not going anywhere with your assumptions.

The guy is violating YouTube's standards and other YouTubers with the exception of The Quartering agree with my opinion on the matter. The guy's peers see through his lies and the violations on his channel. YouTube has a policy against this type of clickbait and the porno type of thumbnails on many of his videos.

It is clear we are running in circles. I post a counter point and you falsely accuse me of not researching any information. I shall leave this topic. Good day people.

[ivandobsky]

I like MxR plays. Not really worth my time finding out all the details here, but Youtube's demonitisation is arbitrary, unpredictable and unaccountable, and pains many.

Creators like MxR would do well to use other platforms. I like Odysee. Its search and suggested related videos features are a far cry from Youtube's, but its monetisation is open and sensible.

[Femina]

Youtube is notoriously bad with its communication with their content creators and accepting any old copyright claim on anything. I could file a loose copyright claim against anyone's video right now out of pure SPITE and Youtube would just take my word for it and all the hard work toward proving it a false claim would be on the content creators end... and I'd probably suffer no consequences for it.

I'm not saying everyone should be allowed to spuriously post videos about whatever they want without thinking about any of the details... but Youtube needs to work out a better system for defining what is and isn't copy protected content, they need to make a devision of their company dedicated to INVESTIGATING this shit, and they need to start treating all copy claims as false until proven true. This 'Guilty till proven innocent' shit is just a whole lot of corporate ass wiping.

[Damselbinder]

Indeed. Like, with this situation, I get the idea behind the demonetisation: the thumbnails had sexual content or whatever. That's fine for YT to ban/demonetise if it's genuinely and clearly against their terms of service, but the problem here seems to be total arbitrariness - some are banned and not others; no explanation; no possibility of appeal. Even if Mxr were doing something wrong they were still treated shittily. This, as far as I can tell, is their livelihood.

[ThePornCritic]

Indeed. Like, with this situation, I get the idea behind the demonetisation: the thumbnails had sexual content or whatever. That's fine for YT to ban/demonetise if it's genuinely and clearly against their terms of service, but the problem here seems to be total arbitrariness - some are banned and not others; no explanation; no possibility of appeal. Even if Mxr were doing something wrong they were still treated shittily. This, as far as I can tell, is their livelihood.

The demonetization due to violations of the policy will not end them. They are lying about that. That's why I've suggested to people to do their research.

MXR earns over $17,000 PER MONTH on Patreon. That is more money than the average American's monthly salary. As many YouTubers have pointed out, MXR is using this video to advertise the patreon and manipulate viewers.

https://www.patreon.com/mmoxreview

Furthermore, MXR is lying about demonetization. I just checked one of his videos in Firefox without ad blocker. It has ads. He is earning money from ads.


That's why I've said there are two sides to every story. Not every video has been demonetized. His channel is not dead. He just advertised an Onlyfans account after lying about losing money from YouTube. This is a clear scam scam scam.

I know I said, I would leave this topic. However, I need inform others of the lies from MXR.

[Damselbinder]

Indeed. Like, with this situation, I get the idea behind the demonetisation: the thumbnails had sexual content or whatever. That's fine for YT to ban/demonetise if it's genuinely and clearly against their terms of service, but the problem here seems to be total arbitrariness - some are banned and not others; no explanation; no possibility of appeal. Even if Mxr were doing something wrong they were still treated shittily. This, as far as I can tell, is their livelihood.

The demonetization due to violations of the policy will not end them. They are lying about that. That's why I've suggested to people to do their research.

MXR earns over $17,000 PER MONTH on Patreon. That is more money than the average American's monthly salary. As many YouTubers have pointed out, MXR is using this video to advertise the patreon and manipulate viewers.

https://www.patreon.com/mmoxreview

Furthermore, MXR is lying about demonetization. I just checked one of his videos in Firefox without ad blocker. It has ads. He is earning money from ads.


That's why I've said there are two sides to every story. Not every video has been demonetized. His channel is not dead. He just advertised an Onlyfans account after lying about losing money from YouTube. This is a clear scam scam scam.

I know I said, I would leave this topic. However, I need inform others of the lies from MXR.

I beg your pardon, but you appear not to know about Youtube's mechanics. A video can run ads without being monetised. That is, YOUTUBE can run ads that gain ITSELF money without the creator seeing a penny.

[tallyho]

Let's all keep it on friendly terms gents, don't want this to get out of hand.

[ThePornCritic]

I beg your pardon, but you appear not to know about Youtube's mechanics. A video can run ads without being monetised. That is, YOUTUBE can run ads that gain ITSELF money without the creator seeing a penny.

I beg your pardon, black people can understand YouTube's mechanics. How do I know? I have a YouTube channel and have earned money from monetization. I also have Google Adsense on my non-adult site and it has the same basic guidelines as Youtube. It is very sad when the SHIP community continues to ignore any facts from black people with experience in this community. Very sad

Did you watch the video? I'm asking, I'm not assuming or accusing you of not watching it. The guy said "advertisers do not want to appear in his videos".

If advertisers did not want to appear on his videos, then those videos would have zero ads period.

This is the video with the thumbnail of a blowjob. It has ads. This disproves the guy's statement that advertisers do not want to appear in ads on his videos.

[ivandobsky]

That's not a blowjob. It's a girl in a bikini.

[ThePornCritic]

That's not a blowjob. It's a girl in a bikini.

You don't see the girl with a dick in her mouth next to the girl in the bikini.

[Mr. X]

I beg your pardon, black people can understand YouTube's mechanics.

I'm done here. NOBODY said anything about "black people". You're looking for a fight.

[ThePornCritic]

I beg your pardon, black people can understand YouTube's mechanics.

I'm done here. NOBODY said anything about "black people". You're looking for a fight.

I have presented facts from my experience with Google (owns YouTube). I clearly explained my experience with them. I provided facts about policy and the content on MXR's channel. The majority of people in this topic have tried to discredit me with lies and made false assumptions about my behavior. For instance, you falsely said I did not watch the video. That was not the case. Damselbinder lied that I have no knowledge of YouTube's standards when I am in fact a YouTuber and member of Google Affiliate. I have already stated. Therefore, Damselbinder knew he was lying and attempting to discredit a black man without just cause.

I provided quotes from the video. Yet you and others continued to discredit me after I provided factual statements from MXR in their video.

It is a common trend in the SHIP community (all sites and groups except mines) to discredit black people in the SHIP community. I've attempted to offer facts and you alongside others refused the factual information and have lied about my statements and behavior.

[ivandobsky]

That's not a blowjob. It's a girl in a bikini.

You don't see the girl with a dick in her mouth next to the girl in the bikini.

The girl with a nice big arse?

[ThePornCritic]

That's not a blowjob. It's a girl in a bikini.

You don't see the girl with a dick in her mouth next to the girl in the bikini.

The girl with a nice big arse?

I see what you're doing. Enjoy those thumbnails.

[Mr. X]

That's not a blowjob. It's a girl in a bikini.

You don't see the girl with a dick in her mouth next to the girl in the bikini.

The girl with a nice big arse?

BTW I've seen that video. That is the girl's arm. She bends her wrist to the side away from the camera. So its not a "blow job" its a limber girl with a bent arm.

[ThePornCritic]

The image depicts the illusion of a blowjob. Therefore, it is a policy violation. YouTube and Google clearly state those guidelines. People can only grow in life if they accept accountability.

[ivandobsky]

The latest vid made me laugh. View at your own risk!

[RedMountain]

The issue is that youtube selectively enforces based on how much ad revenue you bring them. There is clickbait and garbage all over the site that they refuse to do anything about because the creators have huge audiences and bring them buckets of money. Twitch is notorious for the same selective enforcement of their policies as are most social media platforms.

Damselbinder is also 2000% correct that youtube can run ads on videos that aren't monetized. Unmonetized videos also get copyright claimed all the time and are monetized with ads for the person who claims the video unless it is disputed or take down. I have a friend who is a small music producer that just started putting his music on youtube and he is under the 1,000 subs to monetize, but youtube runs ads on his videos all of the time that he sees $0.00 from.