
Pizza cutter argument.
Make no mistake. No matter which name you are using, Kara Zor-El or Cir-El, they are presenting this character as Supergirl.Paolone0971 wrote: ↑1 year ago Sasha Calle does not play Kara Zor-El here, but Cir-El
Let's face it because on this misunderstanding (until a few hours ago I believed that Calle interpreted Kara) a war (lol) is being created without sense due to the costume !!!
The costume is different because it's not Kara's !!!
I agree, this lady does not on the face of things say, Hello world, my name is Supergirl.Hello Batgirl 1969
You missed my comment above, where I said that Heelvsbabyface got it correct.Paolone0971 wrote: ↑1 year ago Sasha Calle does not play Kara Zor-El here, but Cir-El
Let's face it because on this misunderstanding (until a few hours ago I believed that Calle interpreted Kara) a war (lol) is being created without sense due to the costume !!!
The costume is different because it's not Kara's !!!
Or did the fact that the Captain Marvel made tons of $$$ for the MCU set a bad precedent of sorts for superheroine-dom? Hollywood probably felt that they can get away with superheroines wearing jumpsuits, and now everyone is doing it.
there is a huge chatter around this (lol) problem and the truth as usual comes to the surface.shevek wrote: ↑1 year agoYou missed my comment above, where I said that Heelvsbabyface got it correct.Paolone0971 wrote: ↑1 year ago Sasha Calle does not play Kara Zor-El here, but Cir-El
Let's face it because on this misunderstanding (until a few hours ago I believed that Calle interpreted Kara) a war (lol) is being created without sense due to the costume !!!
The costume is different because it's not Kara's !!!
Most likely, it is NOT Cir-El. It's Lara Lane Kent from the 2015 Injustice: Gods Among Us series.
Granted, they may indeed still call her "Kara". But it's the Lara Lane Kent costume...guaranteed.
Lara_Lane-Kent_Injustice_Regime_0001.JPG.jpg
No, the Hollywood default has been skin-tight full-coverage for superheroines since the big-screen revival began because they felt they couldn't get away with leotards and miniskirts. The catsuit is the safe sexualization compromise.
I assume you mentioned Megan Rapinoe as an example, because of the recent announcement by Victoria's SecretMr. X wrote: ↑1 year agoSo then someone like Megan Rapinoe or Pee Wee Herman would be fine for all your fetish desires cause "parts is parts"?five_red wrote: ↑1 year ago The anti-woke mob think the old stuff better represents how women look -- it doesn't. The pro-woke mob think the new stuff is a truer representation of how women really look -- it isn't. Hollywood isn't going to waste time searching for someone with breasts or abs shaped to superheroine perfection, when they can get someone who's close enough, and fake the rest.R5
point of order re 'expressing views'tallyho wrote: ↑1 year ago It's a forum, this is our whole raison d'etre to express views on this sort of topic. It doesn't matter where the pics are from, whether official or not, it's fine to express an opinion about how it seems to look, what we would prefer to see or why we think they've done it this way rather than that.
I'm not sure what that question means.
You can't compare the framed and finalized costume of Lady Liberty to the stunt costume snapped by a cell phone in the middle of the day we see of Supergirl here. It hasn't even got the cg'd cape for crying out loud. It's a flawed comparison.
That's an official press still. The two aren't equitable.
And dudes shirtless are perfectly fine.
Because when the nitwits who want to cry, "Female Objectification" do it in public, REAL females laugh in their face. Especially girls and young women, who enjoy their sexuality and the idea of being female. These lovely ladies enjoy wearing, the short skirts, bikinis, and short shorts. They want to highlight and celebrate their female form, because they want to attract a partner. They aren't confused or dissuaded by the, boy haircut, androgynous, pants wearing morons, who want to make them into a male. In spite of this truth, we only seem to hear from the, ridiculous, surly, offended, woke minority, who are telling us we HAVE to do things their way, or else, HAHAHAHA!brdiy wrote: ↑1 year ago One of the great mysteries of life.![]()
Women walking around in real life wearing short skirts, short shorts or bikinis is ok because people should be free to wear whatever it is they are comfortable in.
But women on TV or the movies wearing the same outfits are immediately called out for "female objectification"?
All ice cream flavors are the same because they are all "ice cream".ThePornCritic wrote: ↑1 year ago
There are many ways to celebrate a female's form. Some ways can be sexy with bikinis and short shorts. People can also celebrate the female's body with other types of clothing to highlight other body types and styles. Everyone is different in how they view their physical form and how they want to express it. Either way is perfectly fine.
Yes and "sexist" has no meaning here. If everything is everything to everyone then there is no measure. If there is no hard measure to sexuality then how can their be a measure for sexism.
The abs look very horrible compared to the long, thin and skinny arms and legs. I'd assume if she's the real Supergirl, then those abs would be real and clearly oversized compared to the rest of her body, this could also be some thing with the kryptonian females obviously. Other option would be that Supergirl uses some fake abs to flex embarrassingly, this option sounds even dumber than her skinny long legs look. I don't take any kind of stunt garment in consideration here, overall I'm not too impressed by the overall look, but I'd definitely try similar Superman costume on myself!ivandobsky wrote: ↑1 year ago Is that deliberate unconvincing fake abs, or some kind of stunt garment to which the wires attach?
I read that one. Zod gets a power boost from the Olympian sun God and he and Faora beat the snot out of superman and Wonder Woman. Leave them in a burned out nuclear facility.
Once again, an observation based on leaked pre-production crap without the benefit of vetting, story boarding, camera filters and every other thing they do to make something designed specifically to work within the context of the film.Mr. X wrote: ↑1 year ago Given the leaked BTS clip above she looks rather bottom heavy and the fake musculature is adding to this, especially her lower pelvis. In my opinion this kind of female representation actually diminishes women and the excellence women can attain. Kind of like the current representations of Superman in animation where he doesn't have much muscularity and he's more just a guy in a baggy suit. So I don't think the fake muscles are helping her. They are making her look chubby and bloated.
Sorry, I didn't read the comic and I got the image from a site without checking it
Not sure about that, I'd definitely lose to Faora as Superman so I think she could beat Wonderwoman too!argento wrote: ↑1 year agoSorry, I didn't read the comic and I got the image from a site without checking it. But I still think Diana would beat Faora, she has superior training.
Well when they were first fighting WW was winning but then the two Kryptonians get a sun blast and go to town.
One thing I was thinking was maybe the producers are looking to groom a new market instead of relying on old timers. However I'm doubtful given their prudishness around Gal Gadot and the lack up up skirt shots.McGheeny wrote: ↑1 year ago Yah…No. Looks ludicrous. Just a loser marketing ploy to gain pre-acceptance for a ridiculous change to a classic iconic heroine. No matter how much money they dump into this loser concept, this Superboy outfit will never gain the overwhelming support of a classic iconic female Supergirl costume.
This is a long and overused standard marketing strategy. They pre-purchase items themselves and flood the market with the product. In this way they attempt to bolster support. In doing so, they desperately try and create acceptance for the “New and Improved”. Of course, they target specific groups, and publicize their acquiescence as “Popular”. There are those who truly will enjoy the outfit and that is great! Variety IS the spice of life. Usually though, it is money (or the loss of) that ultimately terminates this type of corporate idiocy. With this “woke” movement, these frighten morons seem happy to throw away; cash, resources, and long-time supporters.
Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot], Google [Bot] and 0 guests