The Ultimate Superheroines Forum

In countless fetish videos, xxx comic scenes and xxx stories the heroines mostly doesn't wear any underwear under their costumes.
I am sure that this is a fantasy-thing for the big majority as it seems?
Guess I am one of the few who actually like the heroine to wear a (sexy) bra and panties underneath. And yeah that counts for the "normal" women as well.
Not so easy to explain why....but I think I like the "added" layer which leaves more mystery and more to unpack...if you know what I mean.

And also I would say that a heroine who fights crime and doesn't wear any underwear would be a ...slut .
Perhaps that is actually what many folks want to see?
Besides ....wearing no underwear would have countless negative effects (hygiene, hanging boobs in the long run, cold weather....) but ok that's me thinking too practical I guess.

So, cast your vote! Poll is open for 15 days.

If she's in a unitard I can live with it it's when she's in a skirt and nothing underneath it really gets me

It seems clear that there are two schools of thought on superheroine garb. Some people want the skimpiest outfits possible and are fine with the costume being removed. The other side prefers slightly more modesty and prefers to be tantalized with the possibility of seeing more. I fall firmly into the second camp. I love heroine outfits with skirts, and I love medium to long capes. I love the long white dress Diana Prince wears in the WW1984 trailer. Sure, short skirts are great, but that long white dress implies modesty, so when an impossibly long, beautiful leg emerges via the full slit you feel like your catching a glimpse of something you shouldn't.

Maskripper wrote: ↑

3 years ago

In countless fetish videos, xxx comic scenes and xxx stories the heroines mostly doesn't wear any underwear under their costumes.
I am sure that this is a fantasy-thing for the big majority as it seems?
Guess I am one of the few who actually like the heroine to wear a (sexy) bra and panties underneath. And yeah that counts for the "normal" women as well.
Not so easy to explain why....but I think I like the "added" layer which leaves more mystery and more to unpack...if you know what I mean.

And also I would say that a heroine who fights crime and doesn't wear any underwear would be a ...slut .
Perhaps that is actually what many folks want to see?
Besides ....wearing no underwear would have countless negative effects (hygiene, hanging boobs in the long run, cold weather....) but ok that's me thinking too practical I guess.

So, cast your vote! Poll is open for 15 days.

I quite agree with you on the underwear thing. I have seen SHIP films where the villain takes off the heroine's skirt and there is nothing underneath and the villain makes fun of her, calling her a slut, and to me, a heroine at the beginning ought to be this wholesome, all-American, virtuous, crimefighter, and the no underwear thing seems to undercut that ideal.

When I did shoots the model wore a bra to keep the goods all nice and presented but then when it came to losing the top the bra wasn't there. Usually the underwear only served to make the model look better till clothes came off.

sometimes underwear in a morph suit or catsuit is just not an option, leotard yes...morphsuits no....

I guess when it is a fantasy there is an impression of "permission" here. If your heroine is not wearing panties or anything it gives off this signal that "she's up for it", no harm, no foul. And if she is wearing panties it gives you a sense of power, that you are removing this token shield of protection so you can have your way. I can see in either scenario it's a win for someone in a fantasy setting.

It depends... for example, the black canary by ed bennes does not need underwear, but the supergirl yes.

Yeah, It depends on the costume. I once ordered a superheroine custom video and I designed some costumes for the heroines and sent in some screen shots along with the script and the heroine's costume included a short skirt ala Supergirl.

They filmed the entire video with the model wearing the skirt with no underwear so every time she threw a kick or spun around you would see everything. That makes no sense. No one would go outside and fight crime like that. It was just dumb. The producer told me that he didn't even NOTICE. Ugh.

Anyway, if the outer costume covers enough to make underwear practical underneath, I am all for it. But then again, I don't like nudity in general, which I know puts me in the minority.

I think it ruins the look of spandex leotards and unitards.

As a producer, we try to pick (Within reason) models that will fill out the costume. The idea here is to get it as close to what was drawn or what we're used to seeing as drawn in comic books. As far as I can remember this didn't include cups and straps, thong underwear (or full bottoms for that matter). So when a model wears these things, and you can see buckles and clasps poking through, it's a disappointment.

However, I have 2 exceptions. One would be skirts as previously mentioned, there should be a covering (that could be removed later!!) But a covering WITH panties would be a no from me , dawg.

2nd exception would be if those items were part of the story line. For example, some type of dissolve of the costume (or costume removal) leaving them in just panties and bra.

I also agree that total nudity breaks the fantasy and I am guilty as charged but sometimes you just can't help yourself!

Anyway, thats my 7 cents.

It depends. There are times, particularly when the heroine is a Supergirl type, where it's hot that they have nothing on under their costume, like they never even imagined it would be an issue.

But I also like heroines like Barbara Gordon as Batgirl, and the fact that they have a bra and panties under the suit speaks to the fact that they're just normal women who are aspiring to be heroines.

I guess it's the goddess/girl next door thing, but played out in costume.

I am a fan of a sexy bra and pantie set under the heroine's uniform. There is just something to be said for the slow peeling away of her confidence, pride, modesty and finally her dignity. Getting a peek of sexy panties teasingly hidden by a short hem is definitely a turn on. Not necessarily a micro mini and definitely not a knee length skirt but a flirty short skirt showing off an amazing pair of sexy long tan bare legs, yum.

I think it would depend on the costume and Heroine in question?

comics Black Canary definitely wear underwear underneath her costume. Just saying...

Definitely with panties.

Skirts...yes.....Catsuits...no...

Yes, I always prefer underwear to full nudity.

batgirl1969 wrote: ↑

1 year ago

Skirts...yes.....Catsuits...no...

My hero...heroine

Yes, definitely prefer underwear, especially with a heroine who wears a skirt. A heroine with virtue would never wear a short skirt without panties. Besides, removal of the panties is part of the villain victory ritual.

Yes, definitely prefer underwear, especially with a heroine who wears a skirt. A heroine with virtue would never wear a short skirt without panties. Besides, removal of the panties is part of the villain victory ritual.

brdiy wrote: ↑

1 year ago

comics Black Canary definitely wear underwear underneath her costume. Just saying...

What issue was this from?

I would say yes, depending on the outfit that they are wearing

I think Sooperhero did a series back in the day where the heroines were stripped of their costumes and they wound up in bras and panties.
I thought it was a good look.

I think it depends on how skimpy the costume is. Thong bottoms probably can't hide underwear.

Yes and pure white.