Are Only Fan customers just simps?

[Mr. X]

I want to break this out into a different thread than the OF model thread.

People keep saying OF customers are simps and incels however this doesn't make sense to me due to the money distribution.

From what I understand something like .3% of the OF girls make the vast majority of the money, like 85%. But why?

If I were an incel meaning I had low self esteem, low aggression, low desire to compete, desperate for attention, why would I join Bell Delphine's site even as a tier 3 subscriber. She has thousands of fans. Logistically it would be impossible for her to dole out any level of attention. I would drown in a sea of other guys.

Instead I would find a girl with maybe 200 followers, throw money at her and get personal attention. Heck she might even call you on the phone or something. I'm sure you can find an OF girl that's pretty and bustier than Bell Delphine.

I would think the money distribution would be a bell curve where the hump is near the middle top end of model quality and the really hot girls would actually get less followers because they are out of the league of incels.

So if these guys are incels and simps why is the distribution all bunched up to the top .3% and these guys are all competing for attention from a small minority of girls who, BTW, you can find across the OF spectrum as far as looks are concerned.

[Damselbinder]

You clearly don't understand the pathetic desperation of the true incel

which, I have to say, surprises me.

[Mr. X]

You clearly don't understand the pathetic desperation of the true incel

which, I have to say, surprises me.

Yes this is what I'm trying to understand. I'm a guy and I don't understand it. Logistically it makes more sense to get attention from a girl with lower numbers, not drown in a sea of other men.

[Damselbinder]

Girls with lower numbers aren't as good looking, idk

[swampy170]

Simps and Incels is making a substantial assumption.

Simps covers a broad demographic - some of which are even married, this does make Simp behaviour even more concerning in my personal opinion.

The fans on OnlyFans vary greatly - from those just looking for fap material, to full-on obsessive types which would traditionally undertake stalking. The latter, or even those just slightly susceptible to obsessive behaviour are the whales of OF.

The issue is the nature of the site, and the gamifying of fan interactions - directly linking the success of OnlyFans creators to the kind of unhealthy "girlfriend experience" interaction, making that form of pervasive experience (drawing fans into a psudo-relationship) the most lucrative.

The best looking is a good way to put it, creators are presented to fans in a similar way to youtube suggested videos - so survival of the hottest is very much a thing.

And as discussed above, those who are most effective at the "girlfriend experience" are prioritised by OF's algorithm.

So no, not just Simps - but Simps do make up the majority of the whales on OF.

[Imagineer]

The issue is the nature of the site, and the gamifying of fan interactions - directly linking the success of OnlyFans creators to the kind of unhealthy "girlfriend experience" interaction, making that form of pervasive experience (drawing fans into a psudo-relationship) the most lucrative.

The best looking is a good way to put it, creators are presented to fans in a similar way to youtube suggested videos - so survival of the hottest is very much a thing.

And as discussed above, those who are most effective at the "girlfriend experience" are prioritised by OF's algorithm.

So no, not just Simps - but Simps do make up the majority of the whales on OF.

The algorithm? Maybe I'm missing something, but I've yet to find anything YouTube-like or Instagram-like about the OnlyFans interface. Three recommendations at a time? Nothing but a banner and short description to entice? Can you even keyword search? Either OnlyFans has successfully monetized surfing for content, or subscribers are finding creators through other media.

Not everybody's looking for the same thing, and even within the transactional model of OnlyFans, I bet there are different models for success. For some subscribers, a huge menu / steady diet of safe anonymous lookieloo at the unattainably perfect superstar works; maybe generic dirty talk or sweet nothings is all they can handle; maybe one-on-one chatting to release is one's goal; maybe they're chasing a very particular set of skills.

And OnlyFans is deliberately opaque about its business. I think all engagement-driven megabusinesses have learned to eschew public transparency. We're unlikely to learn what really makes them tick without tireless investigative journalism.

[Mr. X]

The algorithm? Maybe I'm missing something, but I've yet to find anything YouTube-like or Instagram-like about the OnlyFans interface. Three recommendations at a time? Nothing but a banner and short description to entice? Can you even keyword search? Either OnlyFans has successfully monetized surfing for content, or subscribers are finding creators through other media.

Jacklyn Velvets in a previous thread said something along the lines of the number of fans you bring in effects you're ranking for the suggestion list. So some of these girls like Belle Delphine came in with a huge twitch stream following and so ended up at the top of the suggestion list. Same with porn stars like Kasumi Squirts.

Its a self feeding system. The higher you are on the ranking the first you'll show up on the recommendation list and so you'll get more fans which pushes you higher on the list.

Could be simps and incels are just looking for fapp material and not Girlfriend experiences and so they see the top girls as the quality picks.

OF does offer the appeal of immediate feedback and possible suggestions being played out. If someone wants something from a producer they have to pay for a personal video but with OGF you might get the girl to put on a Sailor Girl suit or do some kink thing while still paying the normal fee.

[thesuperheroines]

I would also mention that not everyone who follows an OF model wants direct interaction. Some simply want to have that 'special access' to content they would never get to see elsewhere.

[Supergirllegend]

I would also mention that not everyone who follows an OF model wants direct interaction. Some simply want to have that 'special access' to content they would never get to see elsewhere.

Exactly. That is why I joined to begin with. And I like supporting the artist for their work if its to my liking. Same with any form of art.

And for any incels out there reading... save up your money and hire an escort and just get rid off this loser mentality. Just get outside and get some fresh air. Unless that's how you want to live.